tnite
06-26 10:00 AM
After we have filed for 485 and lets say we (me and my spouse) receive our EAD's. If I quit my job after 6 months of filing, can my spouse (secondary applicant) continue to renew her EAD's or would she have problems since I (the primary applicant) is no longer working for the company and maybe working for myself?
yes she can renew and you can also renew without any issues.
yes she can renew and you can also renew without any issues.
wallpaper Medium Length Bob Haircut
bijualex29
09-13 03:43 PM
I do not think, we need to break our head against House repulican, they are so bias in their thinking and approch.
I think, senate version will have some chance of incorporating SKILL bill, since they are usually broad minded and willing to listern.
I think, senate version will have some chance of incorporating SKILL bill, since they are usually broad minded and willing to listern.
praveen2008
03-27 09:03 PM
Hello,
My wife is planning to attend for a H4 Visa Re stamping. I have couple of questions regarding the visa application process. Appreciate if you can help me with my questions
1) In DS156 should my answer to the Question� �Has Anyone Ever Files an Immigrant Petition on your behalf� be NO. FYI, my 140 is approved and waiting on 485 priority date. I don�t think I gave my wife�s name yet in my labor or 140 approval process
2) There is a section to be filled in VFS website called� Petition Details from 797/. I assume that principal applicant would be me. However I am not sure what to fill in the following questions
Petition Receipt #
Petition Expiration date
Petitioner Name: I assume it is my company name
Is the above info to be filled in from My 797 ( case type I129)or my wife�s 797( case type I539) Receipt #?
Please advice
Thanks,
My wife is planning to attend for a H4 Visa Re stamping. I have couple of questions regarding the visa application process. Appreciate if you can help me with my questions
1) In DS156 should my answer to the Question� �Has Anyone Ever Files an Immigrant Petition on your behalf� be NO. FYI, my 140 is approved and waiting on 485 priority date. I don�t think I gave my wife�s name yet in my labor or 140 approval process
2) There is a section to be filled in VFS website called� Petition Details from 797/. I assume that principal applicant would be me. However I am not sure what to fill in the following questions
Petition Receipt #
Petition Expiration date
Petitioner Name: I assume it is my company name
Is the above info to be filled in from My 797 ( case type I129)or my wife�s 797( case type I539) Receipt #?
Please advice
Thanks,
2011 in a medium length bob
samrat_bhargava_vihari
06-28 04:20 PM
Folks,
One of my friend needs to get her Educational evaluation done for her H1-transfer. Do you know any one local to Boston ?
any other place is also fine.
thanks
Credential Evaluation : http://www.thedegreepeople.com/evaluations.html
One of my friend needs to get her Educational evaluation done for her H1-transfer. Do you know any one local to Boston ?
any other place is also fine.
thanks
Credential Evaluation : http://www.thedegreepeople.com/evaluations.html
more...
jonty_11
02-14 04:37 PM
As per Immigration-law.com - this might become law by June 2007
tiger05
01-07 12:48 PM
Hi,
My i140 was approved 2 months back and now i got a Full time position in another company.
So my question is, after moving to new company if the dates are made current can i still file for i485 with my old employer if he agrees for it?
Thanks
My i140 was approved 2 months back and now i got a Full time position in another company.
So my question is, after moving to new company if the dates are made current can i still file for i485 with my old employer if he agrees for it?
Thanks
more...
amit_tsh
07-31 10:56 PM
I had filled my & my wife's 485 on July 16th 2007. However I noticed that the check that I had sent for my 485 had a minor overwriting in the amount field. I had filed for my wife's H-4 extension last month with a similar issue in the check and the USCIS has sent the H-4 application back. Obviously, I do not want the 485 application to be rejected. So i need urgent help on this matter from you all immigration experts, please help me weigh my options:
1.) Can I refile 485 for me and my wife? Is it possible to have 2 485 applications for a person.
2.) If I refile, and then the USCIS accepts my first application, then will loose the fees for second application or will it be refunded?
3.) Do you think I will simply be asked for another check if I dont refile (which I really doubt.)
I know the mistake might sound stupid but Please guide me in this dilemma. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
thanks.
1.) Can I refile 485 for me and my wife? Is it possible to have 2 485 applications for a person.
2.) If I refile, and then the USCIS accepts my first application, then will loose the fees for second application or will it be refunded?
3.) Do you think I will simply be asked for another check if I dont refile (which I really doubt.)
I know the mistake might sound stupid but Please guide me in this dilemma. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
thanks.
2010 Mid length mid length bob
chanduv23
09-17 12:20 AM
For the unmotivated folks - if the rally does not have enough numbers and does not pickup media attention - then yes nothing good can happen for you.
Lou Dobbs and Ron Hira will then go to Durbin And Grassley and frame a bill to give you more and more trouble
So you decide - you want to go to rally?
All the Tri State folks and DC area folks - EVERYONE MUST ATTEND THE RALLY
Lou Dobbs and Ron Hira will then go to Durbin And Grassley and frame a bill to give you more and more trouble
So you decide - you want to go to rally?
All the Tri State folks and DC area folks - EVERYONE MUST ATTEND THE RALLY
more...
Macaca
07-22 05:39 PM
Empty Promises (http://www.rollcall.com/issues/53_8/editorial/19419-1.html), July 18, 2007
As Senate Democrats were preparing to go to the mattresses over Iraq voting procedures and as Republicans threatened to stop all activity over a judicial appointment, it's worth recalling what Senate leaders were promising at the outset of the 110th Congress.
On Jan. 4, incoming Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) declared on the floor that "last November, the voters sent us a message - Democrats and Republicans. The voters are upset with Congress and the partisan gridlock. The voters want a government that focuses on their needs. The voters want change. Together, we must deliver that change."
Minutes later, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) observed that "the challenges ahead will not be met if we do nothing to overcome the partisanship that has come to characterize this body over the past several years. A culture of partisanship over principle represents a grave threat to the Senate's best tradition as a place of constructive cooperation. It undermines the spirit and the purpose of this institution. And we must do something to reverse its course."
Six months on, the Senate has devolved into a nonstop brawl. The House, where leaders made let's-work-together promises of their own, also is a cauldron of partisanship, but at least there the rules permit a majority to rule.
But together, they've been able to pass just three pieces of significant legislation - a hike in the minimum wage, expansion of stem-cell research funding and a supplemental appropriation to fund the Iraq War. Only the first was directly signed into law. The second was vetoed by President Bush. The third was vetoed then passed.
Partisan warfare and inaction on issues from health care to immigration to energy - even lobbying and ethics reform, once the top priority for this Congress - has reduced respect for the legislative branch to its lowest level ever. Respect for the presidency is not much higher.
Who's to blame? Senate Democrats accuse Senate Republicans of "obstructionism" - systematic refusal to grant unanimous consent so that bills can be voted upon. Senate Republicans blame Reid for invoking cloture to stifle full debate and the offering of amendments.
The level of rancor is escalating now because Democrats are frustrated that Republicans are insisting on a 60-vote threshold on Iraq War amendments - as though Democrats in the past have not used the 60-vote requirement when it suited them. Republicans are threatening to create procedural chaos and allow little or no action on the floor if Democrats block a single appellate court nominee.
In January, Senators of both parties gathered in the Old Senate Chamber in what McConnell described as "a small act of bipartisanship" that he hoped would lead to a restoration of the Senate's reputation. Now, perhaps, Senators should regather there and contemplate their current level of public esteem.
As Senate Democrats were preparing to go to the mattresses over Iraq voting procedures and as Republicans threatened to stop all activity over a judicial appointment, it's worth recalling what Senate leaders were promising at the outset of the 110th Congress.
On Jan. 4, incoming Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) declared on the floor that "last November, the voters sent us a message - Democrats and Republicans. The voters are upset with Congress and the partisan gridlock. The voters want a government that focuses on their needs. The voters want change. Together, we must deliver that change."
Minutes later, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) observed that "the challenges ahead will not be met if we do nothing to overcome the partisanship that has come to characterize this body over the past several years. A culture of partisanship over principle represents a grave threat to the Senate's best tradition as a place of constructive cooperation. It undermines the spirit and the purpose of this institution. And we must do something to reverse its course."
Six months on, the Senate has devolved into a nonstop brawl. The House, where leaders made let's-work-together promises of their own, also is a cauldron of partisanship, but at least there the rules permit a majority to rule.
But together, they've been able to pass just three pieces of significant legislation - a hike in the minimum wage, expansion of stem-cell research funding and a supplemental appropriation to fund the Iraq War. Only the first was directly signed into law. The second was vetoed by President Bush. The third was vetoed then passed.
Partisan warfare and inaction on issues from health care to immigration to energy - even lobbying and ethics reform, once the top priority for this Congress - has reduced respect for the legislative branch to its lowest level ever. Respect for the presidency is not much higher.
Who's to blame? Senate Democrats accuse Senate Republicans of "obstructionism" - systematic refusal to grant unanimous consent so that bills can be voted upon. Senate Republicans blame Reid for invoking cloture to stifle full debate and the offering of amendments.
The level of rancor is escalating now because Democrats are frustrated that Republicans are insisting on a 60-vote threshold on Iraq War amendments - as though Democrats in the past have not used the 60-vote requirement when it suited them. Republicans are threatening to create procedural chaos and allow little or no action on the floor if Democrats block a single appellate court nominee.
In January, Senators of both parties gathered in the Old Senate Chamber in what McConnell described as "a small act of bipartisanship" that he hoped would lead to a restoration of the Senate's reputation. Now, perhaps, Senators should regather there and contemplate their current level of public esteem.
hair pictures of medium length bob
sanjay05
01-29 12:26 PM
I had infopass appointment yesterday at Dallas. I am waiting for my FP (Check my signature). It was rather simple. They checked the id and the appointment at the outside window and issued a token for me and my spouse (I went alone but took appointment for 2). By the time I cleared security and went inside I already had my token number announced. The IO asked me the reason I was visiting and she checked the 485 notice, punched in something in her system and said you should receive your FP notice within 30 days. She did same for my spouse. I was in and out of the building in 10 mins.
more...
Blog Feeds
03-12 08:40 PM
USCIS has issued a memorandum to Chileans in the US letting them know that various measures are in place to assist some who may face immigration obstacles due to the massive earthquake in their country: The grant of an application for change or extension of nonimmigrant status on behalf of a Chilean national who is currently in the United States, even in cases where the request is submitted after the individual�s authorized period of admission has expired; Re-parole of individuals granted parole by USCIS; Extension of certain grants of advance parole, expedited processing of advance parole requests; Expedited adjudication and...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/03/uscis-reminds-chileans-of-immigration-accomodations.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/03/uscis-reminds-chileans-of-immigration-accomodations.html)
hot 2011 Medium Length Bob
GCisLottery
07-18 11:25 AM
Listen to this: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5564537
Two women who have been longtime employees in a Pittsburgh federal building, as cafeteria workers, are back on the job. They had been fired and told they failed to pass their national security background check.
In the middle you will hear:
Someone "misread" the social security number
This is not related to GC, but gives a glimpse of the quality of security background check. May be compared to FBI name check.
Two women who have been longtime employees in a Pittsburgh federal building, as cafeteria workers, are back on the job. They had been fired and told they failed to pass their national security background check.
In the middle you will hear:
Someone "misread" the social security number
This is not related to GC, but gives a glimpse of the quality of security background check. May be compared to FBI name check.
more...
house Cute Shoulder Length Bob
berryberry6
12-15 07:58 AM
American Family Visas are permanent Immigrant Visas, meaning genuine applicants under this category may obtain permanent residency in America if they meet qualifying requirements.
Family migration is based around 2 general categories; one is based on a preference system and the other offers permanent residency regardless of the demand for Immigrant Visas. The latter, the Non-preference Category, is for immediate relatives of American citizens.
Fiancee's of American citizens will need to apply for a temporary non-immigrant K1 Visa if they wish to join their partner in America.
Tummy Tuck Complications (http://tummytuckguide.com/tummytuckcomplications.php)
Scanning Stages (http://labface.com/suppliers/Scanning-Stages-191)
Family migration is based around 2 general categories; one is based on a preference system and the other offers permanent residency regardless of the demand for Immigrant Visas. The latter, the Non-preference Category, is for immediate relatives of American citizens.
Fiancee's of American citizens will need to apply for a temporary non-immigrant K1 Visa if they wish to join their partner in America.
Tummy Tuck Complications (http://tummytuckguide.com/tummytuckcomplications.php)
Scanning Stages (http://labface.com/suppliers/Scanning-Stages-191)
tattoo medium-length layered ob.
transmit
March 28th, 2005, 03:30 AM
Check it out, plenty of samples (http://www.noendpress.com/pvachier/cameras/nikon_D2X.php) listed on this page. Looks like the D2X is a real winner!